Pages

29 January 2012

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

I am not sure what I could possible say to give Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy the justice it deserves, but I feel the need to say at least something...

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy is a damn impressive film. It is based on John le Carre’s first book in the Karla Trilogy and has been adapted and dramatized before by the BBC. Clearly the tale has some appeal. I mean, I like it. That is why I am surprised to say that while watching this 2011 version, I wasn’t overwhelmingly engrossed with the story. I was more bewitched by its ambiance. The atmosphere that I found myself falling in love with is probably the same thing that will bore the crap out of many viewers. The film has dark and wonderful cinematography and a slow but steady moving plot line. There is a smoky heavy feel to every slow moving minute. And it is topped off with perfectly chosen music which adds to the overall mystery and intrigue.

There is something quite captivating about all of the characters, or as I like to call them the tinkery-tailory-soldiery spies. The cast is a made up of Gary Oldman, Colin Firth, John Hurt, Toby Jones, Benedict Cumberbatch, Mark Strong, and Tom Hardy. Everyone in the film is pretty much known for being great at what they do and in this film everyone lives to their reputation. I have no complaints. Their mannerisms and appearances are almost hypnotizing. I was distracted by and jealous of Oldman’s perfect hair. Seriously, his hair is amazing. And his clothing, all of the clothing in fact, is flawless. The suits and overcoats are not only physically well-fitted on each of the actors, there are also well-fitted to the time period. Even more mesmerizing than Oldman’s hair and clothing was Tom Hardy’s 70s porn star hair and clothes. He seemed out of place next to all of the other key characters, but out of place in a good way.

It is clear that Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy will never be a mainstream blockbuster. It is too intricate and slow moving. But I’m glad that this film was made. It shows that Tomas Alfredson has some serious directing skills in any language. And it is an excellent example of how Gary Oldman is one of the best actors around.

16 January 2012

We Bought a Zoo

We Bought a Zoo lacked much of anything to blow the audience away. The characters were stereotypical and the performances were adequate. Matt Damon played the single father taking care of two children and dealing with the loss of his wife. He was charming and not too depressing. Scarlett Johansson played the zoo keeper as a fairly asexual person for the majority of the film. So, that was good. Thomas Haden Church was the comic relief and concerned brother. He has a knack for making even the most predictable scripts seem better than what they are. And let’s not forget the animals. The animals were all convincing in their parts. Sadly for a movie about the purchase of a zoo, animals were not a huge focus. It is more of a people movie than an animal movie. Of course, there was one tiger that got highlighted and one Capuchin monkey that made her way into a whole lot of scenes on Patrick Fugit’s shoulder.

The most surprising thing about this straightforward film is that the moody teenage son was not required to do any chores on a broken down zoo that needed as much help as it could get. I mean, the adorable scene stealing daughter was willing to make sandwiches and label them PB and J (with a backwards J for added cuteness), but the boy was allowed to sit around all day drawing pictures. It is hard to believe, but as far as family films go that is nothing new. We Bought a Zoo would fit in great on the Lifetime Movie Network. It is a simple film designed to pull at your heart strings.